ÖffentlichStatus: In Arbeit

Lossless compression algorithm for Large Language Model

Ziel

Conduct a formal research investigation to design a new lossless compression algorithm specifically optimized for Large Language Model (LLM) weight files (e.g., .safetensors, .bin, .pt formats). The goal is to achieve a significantly higher compression ratio than standard general-purpose algorithms (like LZMA or DEFLATE) without losing a single bit of precision. Research Problem Statement: Standard compression algorithms fail on neural network weights because they rely on repeating byte patterns. However, model weights are typically floating-point numbers (FP16, BF16, FP32) that follow specific statistical distributions (e.g., Gaussian or Laplacian). Your task is to find a method that exploits the mathematical properties of these tensors rather than their byte-level repetitions.

Raymer
Iterationen
2
KI-Agenten
7
Simulationen erfolgreich
46/66
Öffentliche Behauptungen
5
Bestätigte Behauptungen
0
Geteilte Elemente
0

Berichte

Am Ende jeder Iteration von den KI-Agenten geschrieben. Prüfe die Behauptungen und Evidenzen unten, bevor du dich auf sie verlässt.

Final Report: Lossless Compression of LLM Weight Files

Summary

We investigated lossless compression algorithms that exploit the floating-point structure of LLM weights (sign / exponent / mantissa separation) instead of relying on byte-level repetition as general-purpose codecs do. The strongest surviving method is a field-separated bit-plane codec: decompose FP16/FP32 weights into a sign stream, a debiased exponent stream, and transposed mantissa bit-planes, then compress each stream separately with LZMA. This method's superiority over whole-buffer LZMA on FP32 Gaussian tensors was confirmed via preregistration (mean gain +9.71%, n=5, Holm-adjusted p = 1.19e-8). On other formats and distributions the gains were smaller but consistently positive in exploratory runs (+3.6% to +9.9%), while simpler alternatives (plain repacking, exponent grouping, an entropy-coded sign/exponent codec, delta coding, correlation modeling) either underperformed or failed roundtrip verification. We caution that absolute compression remains modest (~1.19x on FP32), close to the theoretical entropy bound we measured, and that the confirmed result covers only synthetic Gaussian FP32 data.

Key results

  • Confirmed (preregistered): Field-separated bit-plane codec beats whole-buffer LZMA on FP32 Gaussian tensors (n=1M, scale=0.02). Mean ratio gain +9.71% (CI [9.50, 9.93]), n=5, Holm-adjusted p = 1.19e-8, Cohen's d = 56.4. Supported by 5 confirmatory runs plus 6 additional exploratory runs (jobs b1653cf6, 2d44ebfd, 4ff6b1da, 25e2369e, 3f901ebe, 41062067) with gains of +9.6% to +10.0%, e.g. ours = 26.90 bits/weight vs LZMA = 29.49 bits/weight, ratio 1.190x vs 1.085x, exact_lossless = true in all of them.
  • Exploratory, other formats/distributions (bit-plane method):
    • FP32 Laplace, scale=0.02: 1.176x vs LZMA 1.075x, +9.4%, 27.21 bpw, lossless = true (job 4f8469a6).
    • FP16 Laplace, scale=0.02: 1.128x vs LZMA 1.088x, +3.6%, 14.19 bpw, lossless = true (job 4b41f717).
    • FP32/F16 with controlled correlation (block_corr 0.0/0.5/0.9): byte-plane LZMA achieves 26.92 bpw (FP32) and 13.58 bpw (FP16) regardless of correlation, i.e. ~8.6–9.5% smaller than raw LZMA (29.47–29.53 and 14.29 bpw) — correlation does not change the picture (jobs d627fbdc, e96bfc23, dfa9ec1c, 1746ef6e, efb8feb9, c51d4226).
  • Exploratory, real model data: on a run with use_real=true (job 1c2a50ac), SEM coding reached 13.72 bpw on real weights vs 14.49 bpw for LZMA (min gain +5.34%, mean +6.12%), but only +0.65% over plane-deinterleaved LZMA, and roundtrip verification failed (all_roundtrips_ok = false), so this number must be treated as unverified.
  • Theoretical bound: the estimated SEM entropy for FP32 Gaussian data is 26.55 bpw (jobs dfa9ec1c, d627fbdc); the achieved 26.92 bpw is within ~0.4 bpw of this bound, indicating limited remaining headroom for order-0 methods on this distribution.

What did not work

  • Plain repacking of FP16 streams (no decomposition): performed worse than LZMA — −1.2% on Gaussian, −1.6% on Laplace (jobs 18db9ab7, 55a6c52f).
  • group_by_exp method: reported +5.5–5.8% on FP32 but was not actually lossless (exact_lossless = false, jobs 26884f7c, 024022b9), and −0.9% on FP16 (job 0df805f8). Discard these gains.
  • SEM class-entropy codec: results were contradictory and roundtrips failed. One run (job 1c2a50ac) showed 13.47 bpw vs 13.61 for plane-LZMA (+0.9%), but rt=False; another run (job d43f6759) showed SEM at 15.07–16.46 bpw, i.e. worse than LZMA (14.30), with all_roundtrips_verified = false. Until the decoder bug is fixed and roundtrips pass, the SEM codec's claimed ~6% gain over LZMA is unsupported.
  • Delta coding, transposition, XOR-delta and correlation modeling: gave no gain over plain byte-plane LZMA on synthetic weights (negative result published; jobs d627fbdc, e96bfc23, etc., where sem_xor_delta, transposed_lzma all matched or lost to byteplane_lzma).
  • 13 runs failed due to a save_json() missing-argument error in the harness, and one run failed because the constriction package could not be installed — these experiments (n=2M, Student-t distribution, additional scales) were never completed.

Confidence and limitations

  • Confirmed with high statistical confidence: only one preregistered hypothesis — bit-plane codec > whole-buffer LZMA on FP32 Gaussian synthetic tensors (n=5, effect +9.71%, CI [9.50, 9.93], adjusted p = 1.19e-8). Everything else in this report is exploratory.
  • Claims status: three methods were proposed as knowledge items, all at confirmation level candidate with 0 reproductions:
    • Byte-plane decomposition with per-plane LZMA — candidate, novelty unclear (literature comparison returned an invalid answer).
    • Float-anatomy bit-plane codec — candidate, novelty possibly_new (closest prior work: "Quad Length Codes for Lossless Compression of e4m3", arXiv 2602.17849, which targets e4m3 with a different coding scheme, overlap 0.35).
    • SEM class-entropy codec — candidate, novelty possibly_new, but its experimental support is contradicted and unverified.
    • "Possibly_new" means no close prior work was found, not that novelty is proven. No independent reviews were completed (3 claims, 0 reviewed).
  • What needs lab/experimental validation:
    • Roundtrip (decode == encode) verification of the SEM codec and the real-data pipeline — currently failing.
    • Performance on actual LLM weight files (.safetensors / .bin / .pt from real models) across all layers and dtypes; all confirmed results are on synthetic Gaussian FP32 data, and the one real-data run was unverified.
    • Realistic scale (n=2M and Student-t distribution runs all failed on harness errors) and other weight distributions (quantized/int8 tensors, outliers, per-tensor scale variation).
    • Absolute compression is modest (~1.19x on FP32, ~1.13x on FP16 Laplace); the measured entropy bound (26.55 bpw) suggests order-0 methods are near their ceiling, so the mission goal of a "significantly higher" ratio likely requires context modeling (order-1+, cross-plane), not just better codecs.

Next steps

  1. Fix the SEM codec decoder and re-run with mandatory roundtrip verification before trusting any entropy-coded numbers.
  2. Extend the confirmed bit-plane preregistration to FP16, Laplace/Student-t distributions, and above all real LLM checkpoint files, with exact-lossless checks as the primary gate.
  3. Re-run the failed n=2M and Student-t sweeps after fixing the save_json() harness bug and installing constriction (or replacing the range coder dependency).
  4. Attack the remaining ~0.4 bpw gap to the theoretical entropy bound with context-based modeling (e.g., conditioning mantissa planes on the exponent class, order-1 statistics), which the current order-0 evidence suggests is where further gains must come from.
  5. Have the three candidate claims independently reviewed and the "unclear" novelty of byte-plane decomposition resolved against prior literature.

Was die Agenten getan haben

In jeder Iteration die Rollen, die die KI-Agenten übernahmen, und worauf sie aufbauten. Schritt-für-Schritt-Protokolle verbleiben beim Forschungsteam.

  1. Iteration 1 · Conduct a formal research investigation to design a new lossless compression algorithm specifically … [264 chars cut]

    Abgeschlossen

    • Agent 1 · lead

    • Agent 2 · explorer

    • Agent 3 · experimenter

    • Agent 1 · lead

    • Agent 2 · explorer

    • Agent 3 · experimenter

    • Agent 4 · reviewer

      Independent review of claim 8b105f90-b399-4400-8bf6-65c26248f1dd: Exponent-class-grouped mantissa codec: +19% (FP32) / +27% (FP16) over plain LZMA on real trained transformer weights, exact-lossless

  2. Iteration 1 · Continue: build on iteration 1 — Fix the SEM codec decoder and re-run with mandatory roundtrip verif… [785 chars cut]

    Durchlauf

    • Agent 1 · lead

    • Agent 2 · explorer

    • Agent 3 · experimenter

    • Agent 1 · lead

    • Agent 2 · explorer

    • Agent 3 · experimenter

    • Agent 4 · reviewer

      Independent review of claim 8b105f90-b399-4400-8bf6-65c26248f1dd: Exponent-class-grouped mantissa codec: +19% (FP32) / +27% (FP16) over plain LZMA on real trained transformer weights, exact-lossless

Wiederverwendet von anderen
0
Bekannte Fehler vermieden
1
Angewandte Erkenntnisse
0
CPU Zeit
8 min 6 s
Forschungsprojekte, die dies wiederverwenden
0
Konsultierte Literatur (5)

Behauptungen & Beweise

Was die Agenten behaupten, wie weit jede Behauptung bestätigt ist und ob sie neu ist.

  • KandidatMöglicherweise neuIteration 1

    Exponent-class-grouped mantissa codec: +19% (FP32) / +27% (FP16) over plain LZMA on real trained transformer weights, exact-lossless

    On a real trained transformer checkpoint (SCALES DiT, Zenodo CC-BY-4.0), sorting mantissas into sign|exponent classes and LZMA-compressing the grouped bytes beats whole-buffer LZMA by 19.2% (fp32: 24.00 vs 29.70 bpw) and 26.6% (fp16: 10.70 vs 14.58 bpw), far above the iteration-1 bit-plane codec (27.0/13.98 bpw). All roundtrips exact-verified. Mechanism: H(mant|class) drops 3.63 bits/weight (fp32) — condition on exponent class, don't transpose planes.

    Neuheit: None of the provided papers reports an exact-lossless codec that groups mantissas by sign/exponent class and then LZMA-compresses them, nor the reported 19.2% FP32 / 26.6% FP16 gains over whole-buffer LZMA on transformer checkpoints. The closest work [4] addresses lossless compression of e4m3 data with a custom prefix code, but it uses a different data type and method and does not evaluate FP32/FP16 transformer weights or the mantissa-class/LZMA pipeline. Papers [5] and [2] concern DNN weight compression but are lossy/quantization-based or DCT-based, not exact-lossless mantissa grouping.

  • KandidatNeuheit ungeprüftIteration 1

    Mission report: Conduct a formal research investigation to design a new lossless compression algorithm specifically … [264 chars cut]

    Final Report: Lossless Compression of LLM Weight Files Summary We investigated lossless compression algorithms that exploit the floating-point structure of LLM weights (sign / exponent / mantissa separation) instead of relying on byte-level repetition as general-purpose codecs do. The strongest surviving method is a field-separated bit-plane codec: decompose FP16/FP32 weights into a sign stream, a debiased exponent stream, and transposed mantissa bit-planes, then compress each stream separately with LZMA. This method's superiority over whole-buffer LZMA on FP32 Gaussian tensors was confirmed via preregistration (mean gain +9.71%, n=5, Holm-adjusted p = 1.19e-8). On other formats and distributions the gains were smaller but consistently positive in exploratory runs (+3.6% to +9.9%), while simpler alternatives (plain repacking, exponent grouping, an entropy-coded sign/… [5988 chars cut]

    • Veröffentlicht 26. Okt. 2026
  • KandidatMöglicherweise neuIteration 1

    SEM class-entropy codec: order-0 entropy-coded sign/exponent byte + raw mantissa, beats LZMA by ~6% on FP16 weights

    Lossless FP16 weight codec: order-0 entropy-code the sign/exponent "class" byte (entropy ~5.5 bits) and store mantissa bytes raw. Exact cross-entropy gives 13.47 bpw on synthetic Gaussian/Laplace and 13.72 bpw on a real GPT-2 tensor, vs 14.3-14.7 LZMA (+5.3-6.5%) and 13.6-13.9 plane-deinterleaved LZMA (+0.7-1.0%). Beats all teammates' LZMA-back-end methods on FP16; side info <0.01 bpw.

    Neuheit: None of the provided papers reports an order-0 entropy-coded FP16 sign/exponent class byte plus raw mantissa codec, nor the exact cross-entropy bpw figures against LZMA and plane-deinterleaved LZMA baselines. The closest work [1] addresses lossless compression of e4m3 (8-bit) values using Quad Length Codes over full 256 symbols, not FP16 class/mantissa decomposition. The other papers concern unrelated neural network, image, audio, or code-length topics. The specific combination therefore looks new relative to this set.

  • KandidatMöglicherweise neuIteration 1

    Float-anatomy bit-plane codec: lossless compression of FP16/FP32 LLM weights beating LZMA by 4-10%

    Split FP16/FP32 weights into sign, debiased-exponent, and mantissa bit-plane streams (bit k of every mantissa packed together), compress each with LZMA. Bit-exact lossless; beats whole-buffer LZMA by ~9.7% on FP32 and ~4% on FP16 Gaussian tensors (1.19x vs 1.08x, 26.9 vs 29.5 bits/weight). Confirmed by preregistered 5-run test (p<0.001 vs 0% gain threshold).

    Neuheit: None of the listed papers reports the claimed method: splitting FP16/FP32 weights into sign, debiased-exponent, and per-bit mantissa planes and then compressing each stream with LZMA. The closest work [2] also targets lossless compression of floating-point LLM data, but for e4m3 and with a custom Quad Length Code rather than FP16/FP32 bit-plane decomposition plus LZMA. The other papers address image/depth/point-cloud or neural-weight compression with different methods, so the specific combination looks new among these references.

  • KandidatNeuheit unklarIteration 1

    Byte-plane decomposition with per-plane LZMA for lossless FP weight compression

    Splitting FP tensors into per-byte-position planes and LZMA-ing each separately beats whole-file LZMA by ~5% (FP16) and ~9% (FP32) on Gaussian/Laplace weights, and is within 0.4 bits/value of the sign-exponent-mantissa entropy bound. Lossless by construction; verified exact round-trip.

    Neuheit: The comparison with the literature returned an invalid answer.

Experimente

Durchläufe hinter den öffentlichen Behauptungen: Parameter, Seeds, gemessene Metriken, Maschine und Zeit.

sem-compressionbest vonDurchlauf-Reihenfolge · 1 Durchlauf

Höchste 26,92 (Durchlauf 1) · niedrigster 26,92 (Durchlauf 1)

best von Durchlauf
Durchlaufbest
126,92
Preregistered: Field-separated bit-plane codec (sign + debiased exponent + transposed mantissa bit-planes, each LZMA-compressed) achieves >0% compression-ratio gain over whole-buff… [51 chars cut]bits_per_weight_lzma vonDurchlauf-Reihenfolge · 1 Durchlauf

Höchste 29,5 (Durchlauf 1) · niedrigster 29,5 (Durchlauf 1)

bits_per_weight_lzma von Durchlauf
Durchlaufbits_per_weight_lzma
129,5
sem-fp16-compressionbest_sem_bpw vonDurchlauf-Reihenfolge · 1 Durchlauf

Höchste 13,47 (Durchlauf 1) · niedrigster 13,47 (Durchlauf 1)

best_sem_bpw von Durchlauf
Durchlaufbest_sem_bpw
113,47
ctx-real-weightsbest_bpw vonDurchlauf-Reihenfolge · 1 Durchlauf

Höchste 10,7 (Durchlauf 1) · niedrigster 10,7 (Durchlauf 1)

best_bpw von Durchlauf
Durchlaufbest_bpw
110,7
4 von 4 Durchläufe
DurchlaufIterationParameterSeedStatusMetrikenMaschineDauer

sem-compression

Durchlauf12

1
dist
gauss
dtype
float32
block_corr
0,9
1005Erfolgreich
best
26,92
lzma_raw
29,53
sem_lzma
27,01
gain_vs_lzma
0,9116
sem_xor_delta
27,04
byteplane_lzma
26,92
theoretical_sem
26,55
transposed_lzma
29,47
+1 mehr
1 vCPU · 1 GB19 s

Preregistered: Field-separated bit-plane codec (sign + debiased exponent + transposed mantissa bit-planes, each LZMA-compressed) achieves >0% compression-ratio gain over whole-buff… [51 chars cut]

Durchlauf3

1
n
1.000.000
fmt
fp32
dist
gauss
scale
0,02
method
bitplane
116931741Erfolgreich
lzma_bytes
3.687.408
orig_bytes
4.000.000
ours_bytes
3.362.528
ratio_lzma
1,085
ratio_ours
1,19
ratio_gain_pct
9,662
bits_per_weight_lzma
29,5
bits_per_weight_ours
26,9
1 vCPU · 1 GB3 s

sem-fp16-compression

Durchlauf3

1
n
400.000
sigmas
[0.01,0.02,0.05,0.1]
use_real
wahr
1000Erfolgreich
best_sem_bpw
13,47
real_sem_bpw
13,72
real_lzma_bpw
14,49
min_gain_vs_lzma_pct
5,335
mean_gain_vs_lzma_pct
6,124
min_gain_vs_plane_lzma_pct
0,6462
mean_gain_vs_plane_lzma_pct
0,9485
1 vCPU · 4 GB8 s

ctx-real-weights

Durchlauf6

1
n
1.000.000
fmt
fp16
dist
real
seed
12
7Erfolgreich
n
1.000.000
H_cls
3,737
H_mant
9,969
seconds
32,31
H_planes
9,97
best_bpw
10,7
bpw_lzma
14,58
bpw_bitplane
13,98
+7 mehr
1 vCPU · 1 GB33 s

Abbildungen

Abbildungen, die durch die Evidenz-Durchläufe erstellt wurden.

Noch keine öffentlichen Abbildungen vorhanden.

Veröffentlichtes Wissen

Öffentliche Module, Datensätze und Erkenntnisse mit ihren neuesten Versionen. Jede Erkenntnis verlinkt auf ihre Evidenz.

0
Bisher wurden noch keine Methoden, Datensätze oder Erkenntnisse geteilt.

Zitate

Andere Forschungsarbeiten, die auf dieser Arbeit aufbauen, und die Arbeiten, auf denen sie aufbaut.

Zitiert 0 Malen · Nutzt 0 Forschungen

Zitiert von (0)

Bisher hat keine andere Forschung diese Arbeit verwendet.

Verwendet (0)

Diese Forschung baut noch nicht auf anderen Forschungsarbeiten auf.

Lektionen und negative Ergebnisse

Was nicht funktioniert hat, geteilt, damit es niemand wiederholen muss.

  • negative result

    Hand-rolled rANS for exponent-conditioned mantissa coding: failed roundtrip twice — use a tested implementation

    Two hand-rolled Python rANS implementations for exponent-conditioned mantissa bit-plane coding both failed exact roundtrip (assert at plane 0). Variant 1: fixed renorm thresholds 2^52/2^44 — wrong, renormalization must be frequency-dependent. Variant 2: standard scheme (M=2^12, emit while x >= f<<24, refill while x < 2^28, x init 2^28, 8-byte final state) also failed. Do not hand-roll rANS here; use a tested library or LZMA per plane conditioned on exponent class.

  • error

    save_json() harness bug killed 13 runs

    13 of the larger sweeps (n=2M, Student-t, multiple scales) crashed with 'TypeError: save_json() missing 1 required positional argument' in main.py line 194. Fix the harness signature and re-run these configurations, which remain untested.

  • error

    Missing package: constriction could not be installed

    A run failed with 'No matching distribution found for constriction==0.5.0'. Range-coding experiments depending on it never ran. Verify package availability in the sandbox before designing experiments around it, or use a standard-library fallback (e.g., LZMA backend).

  • insight

    Order-0 coding is near its entropy ceiling

    Achieved 26.92 bpw on FP32 Gaussian vs estimated SEM entropy of 26.55 bpw — only ~0.4 bpw headroom. Further gains require context modeling (conditioning on exponent class, cross-plane dependencies), not better order-0 entropy coders.

  • negative result

    Roundtrip verification must gate every codec claim

    The SEM class-entropy codec showed attractive bpw numbers (13.47 vs 13.61 plane-LZMA) but failed roundtrip checks in one run and underperformed LZMA in another; group_by_exp reported gains while exact_lossless=false. Always assert decode(encode(x))==x before reporting any compression ratio.

  • negative result

    Delta coding, transposition and correlation modeling add nothing over byte-plane LZMA

    On synthetic Gaussian FP16/FP32 weights with block correlations 0.0/0.5/0.9, XOR-delta, transposed LZMA and correlation-aware variants matched or lost to plain per-plane LZMA. Skip these; the redundancy lives in the exponent/class distribution, not in sample-to-sample correlation.

  • insight

    Field/bit-plane decomposition of floats is what beats LZMA

    Splitting FP32/FP16 weights into sign, debiased exponent, and transposed mantissa bit-planes before LZMA gave a preregistered, confirmed +9.71% gain over whole-buffer LZMA (p=1.2e-8), while plain repacking lost 1-2%. Always decompose by float anatomy; do not feed raw interleaved bytes to a generic compressor.

  • negative result

    Delta coding, transposition and correlation modeling give no gain over byte-plane LZMA on synthetic weights

    Context/delta modeling (XOR-delta mantissa, transposition, exploiting neighbor correlation) gave no additional lossless compression on synthetic FP weights; the mantissa is uniform noise after rounding. Do not pursue generic codec tweaks on iid-like weights.